极品基老伴第一季

同性恋，我向来认为没什么不可说的，但还是为他们的生活感到担忧，无论在哪里，很少有同性恋者有固定的同性伴侣，而且是很多很多年，甚至结婚。所以我从不深入现实世界看同性恋者们的信息。我喜欢看小说，耽美的，只看喜剧，因为我希望同性恋也好，异性恋也好，我只愿天下有情人终成眷属。很感动，即使他们那样互相讽刺，看起来就像前世有杀子之仇夺妻之恨似的，但在各种语言后，他们还是会在一起，互相拥抱，亲吻，仿佛之前的剑拔掳张都不存在一样，会因为怕对方担心，不说出自己现在的困窘，会为对方偷偷做点什么。就像他们还是热恋一样。我很喜欢。

在本国，重视老人的辈分和低位，多见倚老卖老，而在欧美，老去则不那么愉快，文化上还时更崇尚年轻和活力。对于老年人的玩笑，尺度大点儿算是恶毒语言了，由老人们自己嘴里冒出来，互相吐槽，就会意外地有趣。
这是简单的情景剧，大部分的场景是他们家客厅，两位男主乃是揶揄大神，不断扔段子，可爱极了。他们说话文绉绉的，老绅士风范可比貌似缺乏传统文化熏陶的大西洋彼岸优雅得多了。每集只有20分钟，一季只有6集，一晃就过去了。剧本精炼而精彩，或许是英剧的魅力之一。

对于大部分中国人甚至说地球人来说，同志还是一个较为隐晦或者说见不得光的存在（剧中用两位主角家中的窗帘从来不拉开作了一个隐喻）。
不管社会上的人对他们怎么看，全剧有一个自始至终的家庭因素对他们的束缚。从开头到结尾，Stuart的母亲，一直作为一个如影随形的阻碍贯穿始终每次打电话过来Stuart都要找各种各样的理由骗他的母亲自己还是单身，阻止他母亲过来，49年来Stuart一直没能向他的母亲出柜。当然这只是电视剧，真实生活中假如真有半辈子的时间父母早就知道了，这也是笑点所在，甚至Stuart在他母亲到来前深吸几口大气，简直要窒息过去的样子。虽然让人觉得好笑，但现实生活中的基友们的真实状况却着实比他们悲惨多了。
Ash的一次失误导致了两个基老伴的出柜，也幸好是这次失误，让他们，尤其是Stuart开始了新的人生。现实生活中大概也往往如此，gay们的出柜大多并非自愿，各种阴错阳差导致了坦诚相对的一天，但也正是这一天的到来很多人最终搬走了压在胸口的大石。
嬉笑怒骂还在，不同的是你我已经光明正大的在一起。
最喜欢剧末Freddie 对Stuart妈妈说的话：
Well,we are going to talk about it.And you are going to listen.
The man you are talking so disrespectfully to is not only your son but my partner of 49 years!And I will have you know he is the most wonderful man in the world and I am proud to call him my lover!Yes,we have a few minor differences over the years but I can't imagine my life without him.So when you talk to him,you talk to him with respect.He cares you very deeply about you but unless you can accept him and our relationship,you are not welcome here.
。
。
。
。
。
。
Hope to say She’s my partner proudly in front of my parents someday.

         2016/7/13 下午7:49
     我是喜欢英语的人，但是却真的没有看过任何美剧，每次听别人聊美剧都觉得自己是局外人，曾经也想附庸风雅，于是去搜索他们口中的香饽饽各种美剧，但都坚持不了5分钟，就忍不下去了。
     这不？又闲了，除去看书，上网实在没有事情做，我一直不明白有人离不开网，因为我不知道上网我应该干什么，我上网会想个傻瓜一样，我对娱乐，体育，金融，赚钱，游戏，网购，世界各地的天灾人祸都不敢兴趣。
想起最近收到的诈骗短信和邮件，对方都是用我的身份信息，推算我的年龄和可能遇见的问题，模仿情侣，模仿领导，模仿某网站给我发信息都让我哭笑不得：
您孩子的分数——我孩子，呵呵；
你领导。。。。。。——我领导，呵呵；
你和某某的视频——我，呵呵；
因为你最近在某网站的贡献——我至少半年没有上那个网站了，哪有贡献？他们不知道某网站关闭对XJ的开放吗？呵呵。
技术含量这样的骗局这么多，大家都这么缺钱？

话说这个英剧，这是我唯一看过的英剧，昨天竟然看完了一季，原因很简单，一季一共6集，半小时一集很过瘾，这6集的长度合计也就不足一部印度电影的长度，哈。

好看在哪里？
英式幽默比美式幽默高级？我也没有看过美剧，根本不知道什么美式幽默，无法对比。
虽然和外国人共事了整整三年，有英式口语，也有美语，因为都可以听得懂，不觉得有太多区别，对于我英式发音比美语不那么容易听懂。对于幽默，我觉得老外和中国人都一样，该笑的地方都笑，没有太多地域差别。

两个老头在一起生活了48年后的晚年逗趣生活，喜剧的高明在于笑料里很多真谛和真相，笑过之后还会回味。
除了喜欢这两个老头，还特别爱那个健忘的老奶奶，可爱死了。
另外，每次开场斯图亚特给母亲编谎话的电话，也是一个盼头，怎么能编48年呢，真是让人唏嘘。

我们的电视拍不出这样的内容和东西，但是还好网络上还是让放了；
而我们的演艺明星里少有晚年的题材还能如此受到广泛关注，更没有那个电影节在中华大地上能让老年影星获得最佳男女主角的，只看小鲜肉。

社会发展的阶段不同吗？
不知道。

 对于我这种扣脚挖鼻刮腿毛的女汉子来说，爱来爱去，要死要活，痛哭流递，满地打滚的调调完全不是我的菜。
生活中如此，选择电视电影也一样，嫌看着糟心......烦心......不省心....
韩国苦情杯具戏...国产小三战大房类感情大戏..吸血鬼三角恋之流 ...全绕道而走.一集不看
最近很巧的是，我看这部戏的时间和看泊小豆关于爷爷的博文是一个时间
都是老人家的故事，但都真正的打动了我.。
回到这部戏，两位老艺术家自然不用介绍了（请注意我没有用演员来称呼哦, 像指环王三部曲中甘道夫的台词我都能背下来这种事我会说嘛!)
私下认为，英国人的幽默是慢热型的，外表端庄下往往跳着一颗吓死人不偿命的心。笑点，萌点什么的之前各位大神评论中提到很多了，我表示都举双手认同，嗯嗯嗯。
我这个女汉子竟然发现了这戏中很多地方会让人感动，虽然我也觉得自己并没有多少细腻的感情来表达..........
戏中两位老爷子互相毒舌功力的让我等凡人看剧时只能说“我了个去，原来还能这样吐槽，学习学习”
但是两位老爷子之间的感情也是真好啊，比如老斯会为了给老费买出席典礼穿的大衣，而在古稀之年到时装店打工，可以为了这件衣服被一个比自己孙子年纪都要小的年轻人使唤。而老斯唯一担心只是考虑老费的面子，不想让老费知道这件事，而小威问老斯你的尊严呢？答之消失很久了...................而老费知道后也配合着老斯演尊严戏码。
这是一对同居48年的七十多岁的老俩口，他们的脾气互相摸的很透，我觉得他们之间的毒舌其实更类似于“看，我很好，我健康着呢。我还能和你开玩笑呢，我不会死的，你放心吧”就像20岁的狗狗..如果一段时间不动两个人都会惊慌失摸的用拖把捅它............类似很多，小细节大态度，当爱什的会做肥皂的女朋友攻击老费时，老斯厉声呵斥.等等等
而放到现实中，有多少夫妻可以互相搀扶携手走过半个世纪？无论贫穷，富有、健康，疾病？
我觉得这部戏的所有人包括导演，他们所想展现给观众的可不是一部喜剧而已，还有很多.....
关于同性的态度：
也许很多年青人认为同性在一起，是非常酷非常时髦的一件事，有个性，酷，赞。强！然后男生装娘炮、涂脂摸粉，女生装爷们，板寸叼烟。走在街上和同性搂搂抱抱，就认为自己走在了时尚尖端.........
也有另一部人，认为同性在一起，是很可怕很罪恶的事，恶心，异类！可怕！吐！然后肆意辱骂嘲笑........
这个在国内有在国外如是..........
我常常对身边一些号称同性恋的小朋友说，如果你能保持这种感情到30岁，你才有资格说自己是同性恋，这种以流行为追逐，口号式标签式的“同性恋形为”不叫出柜！很多“玩”同性恋的孩子以后和异性结婚生子过着幸福般的夫妻生活的不在少数。
而另一种人，我只能说，不明白的事情就不要评论，不理解可以沉默。这个世界谁也不比谁干净多少，谁也不比谁肮脏多少。 没有任何人有资格站在道德审判高度来批判别人.
而这部戏两位明确出柜的老爷子告诉我们，爱情没有性别之分，也不会因为时间而冲淡。同性和异性夫妇本质上没有任何区别，这就是事实。这样真挚真诚的感情同样会让人动容。
关于老年
芳华都是我们总将逝去的，不管它曾多么的精彩。而年纪大了以后应该怎么去生活我个人觉得也这戏想告诉观众的。每个人都将老去，像这两位心情愉快的走下去才是正道。

以前我一直觉得"有情饮水饱"听起来很装逼。。。但是看到两位老爷子戏中就算是领着养老金还是过的乐呵呵的，这话放在这里听起来一点不刺耳.........
只要这戏放下去，我就一直追下去........脑残粉就脑残粉吧

Q: What drew you to Vicious?

A: Derek and I arranged a reading with friends. We went round to Derek’s and read the script, and our friends laughed all the way through. I thought, “Aha, it works.” Its aim is to entertain people by making them laugh, and once I realised it did, I was very glad to do it.

Q: Please describe your character for us.

A: Freddie is a pain in the neck, but he’s also a survivor. He’s game. He’s always up for it. He is also honest and is not afraid to speak his mind. I really do like Freddie.

Q: How would you characterise the relationship between Freddie and Stuart?

A: It’s a relationship of long standing. They have fallen into the habit of being horrid to each other. Although they’ve got into this habit, they clearly still love each other in the way that people who have been together for nearly 50 years do. They’ve survived. Anyone who was gay in the 1970s was rather heroic -‐ when Freddie and Stuart first knew each other, it was actually illegal. But they’ve come through thick and thin together, and are still incredibly close.

Q: Do they like to keep the rest of the world at bay?

A: Yes. They are not aware of much outside their own flat. They keep their curtains closed to shut out the outside world. The serious point is that for much of their lives they have had to live privately.

Q: Do you think this show will shock some people?

A: No. It’s not aiming to shock people. It won’t alarm anyone. It isn’t a satire or an expose of gay life. These characters just happen to be gay. For me it is as if TV has grown-‐up. In the past gay characters in sitcoms have been figures of fun. They were funny because they were gay. But I like the fact that these characters are funny because of the people they are. That’s a real advance.

Q: What do you think its appeal will be?

A: I think it’s a family show that will get the broadest possible demographic. Old people will respond to it and see themselves in it, gay people will respond to it and see themselves in it, and the rest will respond to it and see themselves in it. Everyone will be able to relate to these characters. It wasn’t meant to be a gay or an old audience.

Q: Have you enjoyed the studio recordings?

A: Very much so. Initially it seems confusing because as a theatre actor you think the audience is out there. But you have to remember that you also playing to an audience down the camera. You have to rely on the wonderful director, Ed Bye, who is a veteran of this type of comedy, to make sure you get the level right. Also at first it’s worrying as you think, “Am I going to remember the lines?” In the theatre, you have more rehearsal time, and in film you can stop and start. But with this, you just have to keep going. However, it’s really useful to have the studio audience there because they tell you exactly what’s funny.

Q: How have you found it working with Gary Janetti?

A: It’s been wonderful. It’s a fairly traditional sitcom which reminds me of The Golden Girls or I Love Lucy. Gary is very, very alert to what’s comedic. He writes hythmically and with great accuracy. He is very particular that we speak the lines exactly as they are written, in order to elicit a laugh. He’s marvellous to work with. All in all, it’s been a bit of a love-‐in!

Q: What are the advantages of casting you and Derek as Freddie and Stuart?

A: We don’t have to pretend we’ve known each other for 50 years because we have. It was a great relief when I saw the first episode and Freddie and Stuart looked as if they’d been together forever. That ease with each other is essential to the show. Some people will be delighted that Derek and I are making fun of ourselves. We’ve had a ball making Vicious. It’s been an absolute delight.